Skip to content
Improving Immunization Rates: A Quality Improvement Approach
Video Lesson – Improving Immunization Rates
Course Evaluation
Previous Lesson
Course Evaluation
Improving Immunization Rates: A Quality Improvement Approach
Course Evaluation
Improving Immunization Rates Evaluation
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Did you complete this session?
*
Yes
No
Course Evaluation - Improving Immunization Rates
Improving Immunization Rates: A Quality Improvement Approach
Presented by: Fran Griffin, RRT, MPA
Name
*
First
Last
Email
*
Please rate the subject of this session.
*
Excellent
Good
Neutral
Needs Improvement
Needs Much Improvement
Excellent
Item #1 Excellent
Good
Item #1 Good
Neutral
Item #1 Neutral
Needs Improvement
Item #1 Needs Improvement
Needs Much Improvement
Item #1 Needs Much Improvement
Please rate the quality of this session
*
Excellent
Good
Neutral
Needs Improvement
Needs Much Improvement
Excellent
Item #1 Excellent
Good
Item #1 Good
Neutral
Item #1 Neutral
Needs Improvement
Item #1 Needs Improvement
Needs Much Improvement
Item #1 Needs Much Improvement
Please rate the speaker, Fran Griffin, RRT, MPA
*
Excellent
Good
Neutral
Needs Improvement
Needs Much Improvement
Excellent
Item #1 Excellent
Good
Item #1 Good
Neutral
Item #1 Neutral
Needs Improvement
Item #1 Needs Improvement
Needs Much Improvement
Item #1 Needs Much Improvement
Please rate the speaker, Alessandra Petrillo, MD
*
Excellent
Good
Neutral
Needs Improvement
Needs Much Improvement
Excellent
Item #1 Excellent
Good
Item #1 Good
Neutral
Item #1 Neutral
Needs Improvement
Item #1 Needs Improvement
Needs Much Improvement
Item #1 Needs Much Improvement
Please rate the speaker, Sapan Shah, MD
*
Excellent
Good
Neutral
Needs Improvement
Needs Much Improvement
Excellent
Item #1 Excellent
Good
Item #1 Good
Neutral
Item #1 Neutral
Needs Improvement
Item #1 Needs Improvement
Needs Much Improvement
Item #1 Needs Much Improvement
Please rate the presentation quality of this session
*
Excellent
Good
Neutral
Needs Improvement
Needs Much Improvement
Excellent
Item #1 Excellent
Good
Item #1 Good
Neutral
Item #1 Neutral
Needs Improvement
Item #1 Needs Improvement
Needs Much Improvement
Item #1 Needs Much Improvement
The session content was relevant to your practice.
*
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
If you chose Disagree or Strongly Disagree, please tell us why so we can improve our future educational activities
*
The presenter was knowledgeable in the subject being presented.
*
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
If you chose Disagree or Strongly Disagree, please tell us why so we can improve our future educational activities
*
The presenter effectively addressed the learning objectives of the session.
*
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
If you chose Disagree or Strongly Disagree, please tell us why so we can improve our future educational activities.
*
The delivery of the content was clear and informative.
*
Strongly Agree
Agree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
If you chose Disagree or Strongly Disagree, please tell us why so we can improve our future educational activities
*
The program was balanced and free from commercial bias.
*
Yes
No
If you answered "no", and you think commercial bias was present, please briefly describe the bias you perceived.
*
Did attending this activity improve your knowledge and/or competence?
*
Yes
No
Please list two things you will change or two things that you learned as a result of attending this activity.
*
Do you have any comments or suggestions for the speaker or ACPNJ?
Comment
Submit
Previous Lesson
Back to Course
Scroll To Top
Login
Accessing this course requires a login. Please enter your credentials below!
Username or Email Address
Password
Remember Me
Lost Your Password?
